RE: Your comments on Device Description Repository Simple API (LC-1966)

Here is my counter-proposal

"The value __NULL ('_','_','N','U','L','L') is reserved as the null Aspect, to be employed where a vocabulary does not use or distinguish Aspects of the properties it defines."


-----Mensaje original-----
De: public-ddwg-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-comments-request@w3.org] En nombre de JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
Enviado el: lunes, 26 de mayo de 2008 10:45
Para: rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com
CC: public-ddwg-comments@w3.org
Asunto: RE: Your comments on Device Description Repository Simple API (LC-1966)


The text proposed in http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/080525

"The value __NULL ('_','_','N','U','L','L') is reserved as the null Aspect, to be employed where a vocabulary does not use or distinguish Aspects of the properties defined by the vocabulary"

Does not clarify, the word "vocabulary" is repeated too many times in the sentence

-----Mensaje original-----
De: rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com [mailto:rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com]
Enviado el: domingo, 25 de mayo de 2008 22:22
Para: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
CC: public-ddwg-comments@w3.org
Asunto: Re: Your comments on Device Description Repository Simple API ( LC-1966)


 Dear José Manuel Cantera ,

The Mobile Web Initiative Device Description Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Device Description Repository Simple API published on 4 Apr 2008. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/080525.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at public-ddwg-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 5 June 2008. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Initiative Device Description Working Group, Matt Womer W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/93AA9E47B82F684A868C217766F489050397FB9F34@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/


=====

Your comment on 3 Vocabularies:
> Regarding Section 3, Vocabularies, it is said
>
> "Property and Aspect names must be unique in their namespace and must
> conform to the
> syntax<http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/#NT-NCName>
> defined in "Namespaces in XML" [XML
>
Namespaces]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/#ref-Namespaces>.
> The value __NULL ('_','_','N','U','L','L') is reserved as the null
> Aspect name."
>
> What is the null aspect name? Under which conditions it should be
> used?
>
> The document should clarify


Working Group Resolution (LC-1966):
The following text will be included for clarity:

The name __NULL (whose value is the character sequence:
'_','_','N','U','L','L') is reserved to represent the null Aspect, to be employed where a vocabulary does not use or distinguish Aspects of the properties defined by the vocabulary.

----

Received on Monday, 26 May 2008 12:01:50 UTC