Re: Your comments on Device Description Repository Simple API ( LC-1962)

 Dear José Manuel Cantera ,

The Mobile Web Initiative Device Description Working Group has reviewed
the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Device
Description Repository Simple API published on 4 Apr 2008. Thank you for
having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/080514.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-ddwg-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 24 May
2008. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Initiative Device Description Working Group,
Matt Womer
W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/93AA9E47B82F684A868C217766F489050397FB9F2D@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/


=====

Your comment on :
> This is an editorial comment:
> 
> The current documentation of the method
> 
> public PropertyValues getPropertyValues(Evidence evidence) throws
> NameException; says
> 
> "Return all Available Values"  which is not very clear
> 
> Proposed Amendment:
> 
> "Return all available property values for all the aspects and
> vocabularies known by a DDR"


Working Group Resolution (LC-1962):
The DDWG has resolved to update the text to say: "Return all available
Property values for all the Aspects and Vocabularies known by an
implementation of the DDR Simple API."

----

Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 15:05:23 UTC