W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-datapipelining@w3.org > February 2016

Re: Getting started...

From: Maximilian Gärber <gaerber@axxepta.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:57:42 +0100
To: Ari Nordström <ari.nordstrom@gmail.com>, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Cc: Nic Gibson <nicg@corbas.co.uk>, public-datapipelining@w3.org
Message-ID: <56D01386.1000606@axxepta.de>
Hi,

we (or I) could also post on the XING XML related groups. Some people 
are on both, but a lot of European folks are XING only.

Also, there's https://github.com/xproc/notes/ and this group - would 
that be a general playground or only authored by a few that extract 
ideas from the discussions over here?

Maybe we could use the Github Wiki over there for an introduction to the 
idea/group or is there a (editable) place for that on 
https://www.w3.org/community/datapipelining

Regards,

Max

Am 25.02.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Ari Nordström:
> Hi all,
>
> I don't know what groups outside the XML community to talk to, or how 
> for that matter, but I think asking the XML LinkedIn groups is a 
> sensible idea. Not sure if spamming the people who've posted to the 
> XProc dev list is, though.
>
> Outline the general idea of v2, including the non-XML syntax, ask for 
> use cases and explain the community group's role in it? What else?
>
> Best,
>
> /Ari
>
> On 23 February 2016 at 13:17, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com 
> <mailto:jim@webcomposite.com>> wrote:
>
>     Professor Wil van der Aalst was also recently mentioned, relating to
>     the work done on identifying workflow patterns
>
>     http://www.workflowpatterns.com/
>
>     which maybe indirectly related to identifying use cases.
>
>     hth, J
>
>
>
>     On 23 February 2016 at 12:42, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com
>     <mailto:jim@webcomposite.com>> wrote:
>     > here is the set of use cases the XML Proc WG are using.
>     >
>     > https://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langreq-v2.html
>     >
>     > which are quite specific ... maybe we can boil down to a few
>     categories like:
>     >
>     > * publishing
>     > * data processing
>     > * data hub
>     > * ETL
>     > * metadata management
>     > * document processing
>     > * workflow
>     > * HTTP request processing
>     >
>     > I am not saying xproc should address all these use cases but it
>     would
>     > be good to get real world examples from people today.
>     >
>     > I can try to annotate the ones discussed at the recent public WG
>     > meeting in XML Prague.
>     >
>     > J
>     >
>     >
>     > On 22 February 2016 at 12:41, Nic Gibson <nicg@corbas.co.uk
>     <mailto:nicg@corbas.co.uk>> wrote:
>     >> Morning all.
>     >>
>     >> We’ve been here for a week or so now. I think that we should
>     start to try to communicate to outside our group. If we are going
>     to gather use cases for data pipelining (avoiding the use of that
>     X word), we need to start somewhere and our own community seems to
>     be the right place to start.
>     >>
>     >> I don’t know how acceptable this is but it seems that a mailing
>     to everyone who has posted to XProc Dev within the last few years
>     seems wise as does posting to the XML related groups on LinkedIn.
>     Are these appropriate actions? Are there any other groups we
>     should communicate with? How do we communicate outside of the XML
>     community? Do we want to at this point in time?
>     >>
>     >> nic
>     >> --
>     >> Corbas Consulting / @CorbasLtd
>     >> Digital Publishing Consultancy and Training
>     >> http://www.corbas.co.uk, +44 (0)7718 906817
>     <tel:%2B44%20%280%297718%20906817>/+44 (0)1273 930765
>     <tel:%2B44%20%280%291273%20930765>
>     >>
>     >>
>
>


-- 
Maximilian Gärber

axxepta solutions GmbH

Mühlstr. 10
88085 Langenargen
Tel +49(0)7543 96 42 542
Mail gaerber@axxepta.de
Received on Friday, 26 February 2016 08:58:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:42 UTC