- From: Maximilian Gärber <gaerber@axxepta.de>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:57:42 +0100
- To: Ari Nordström <ari.nordstrom@gmail.com>, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Cc: Nic Gibson <nicg@corbas.co.uk>, public-datapipelining@w3.org
- Message-ID: <56D01386.1000606@axxepta.de>
Hi, we (or I) could also post on the XING XML related groups. Some people are on both, but a lot of European folks are XING only. Also, there's https://github.com/xproc/notes/ and this group - would that be a general playground or only authored by a few that extract ideas from the discussions over here? Maybe we could use the Github Wiki over there for an introduction to the idea/group or is there a (editable) place for that on https://www.w3.org/community/datapipelining Regards, Max Am 25.02.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Ari Nordström: > Hi all, > > I don't know what groups outside the XML community to talk to, or how > for that matter, but I think asking the XML LinkedIn groups is a > sensible idea. Not sure if spamming the people who've posted to the > XProc dev list is, though. > > Outline the general idea of v2, including the non-XML syntax, ask for > use cases and explain the community group's role in it? What else? > > Best, > > /Ari > > On 23 February 2016 at 13:17, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com > <mailto:jim@webcomposite.com>> wrote: > > Professor Wil van der Aalst was also recently mentioned, relating to > the work done on identifying workflow patterns > > http://www.workflowpatterns.com/ > > which maybe indirectly related to identifying use cases. > > hth, J > > > > On 23 February 2016 at 12:42, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com > <mailto:jim@webcomposite.com>> wrote: > > here is the set of use cases the XML Proc WG are using. > > > > https://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langreq-v2.html > > > > which are quite specific ... maybe we can boil down to a few > categories like: > > > > * publishing > > * data processing > > * data hub > > * ETL > > * metadata management > > * document processing > > * workflow > > * HTTP request processing > > > > I am not saying xproc should address all these use cases but it > would > > be good to get real world examples from people today. > > > > I can try to annotate the ones discussed at the recent public WG > > meeting in XML Prague. > > > > J > > > > > > On 22 February 2016 at 12:41, Nic Gibson <nicg@corbas.co.uk > <mailto:nicg@corbas.co.uk>> wrote: > >> Morning all. > >> > >> We’ve been here for a week or so now. I think that we should > start to try to communicate to outside our group. If we are going > to gather use cases for data pipelining (avoiding the use of that > X word), we need to start somewhere and our own community seems to > be the right place to start. > >> > >> I don’t know how acceptable this is but it seems that a mailing > to everyone who has posted to XProc Dev within the last few years > seems wise as does posting to the XML related groups on LinkedIn. > Are these appropriate actions? Are there any other groups we > should communicate with? How do we communicate outside of the XML > community? Do we want to at this point in time? > >> > >> nic > >> -- > >> Corbas Consulting / @CorbasLtd > >> Digital Publishing Consultancy and Training > >> http://www.corbas.co.uk, +44 (0)7718 906817 > <tel:%2B44%20%280%297718%20906817>/+44 (0)1273 930765 > <tel:%2B44%20%280%291273%20930765> > >> > >> > > -- Maximilian Gärber axxepta solutions GmbH Mühlstr. 10 88085 Langenargen Tel +49(0)7543 96 42 542 Mail gaerber@axxepta.de
Received on Friday, 26 February 2016 08:58:21 UTC