- From: Maximilian Gärber <gaerber@axxepta.de>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:32:53 +0100
- To: "Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex" <gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de>
- Cc: public-datapipelining@w3.org
It is always great to see how a topic like "chair candidate" ends up in a discussion about naming things and logos ;-) What about Alex Milowski? I get he's a driving force behind the new spec? Regards, Max Am 16.02.2016 um 02:44 schrieb Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex: > Is “datapipes” sufficiently distinct from “Datapipe”? > > There’s a possibly conflicting “Data Pipes” at > http://datapipes.okfnlabs.org/ > > Maybe not a huge problem. > > I thought about a logo for datapipes and came up with this: > http://www.imsieke.com/gerrit/datapipes/logo/ > > It’s simply two Bauhaus 93 letters with kerning and vertical > positioning adjusted. It looks like there’s some magic connection > between the unconnected pipes that are represented by the geometric, > rounded letters of d and p. It somewhat resembles the Apple (Control) > key, too. And I have some deja vu with this logo. But maybe this is a > good sign. > > Gerrit > > > On 15.02.2016 19:35, Nic Gibson wrote: >> I’ve always been vaguely uncomfortable with the ‘Proc’ part of the >> name (think Proctology I guess). DataPipe is a managed hosting >> services provider. I think we should at least attempt to work out a >> name that is uncommon. >> >> nic >> -- >> Corbas Consulting / @CorbasLtd >> Digital Publishing Consultancy and Training >> http://www.corbas.co.uk, +44 (0)7718 906817/+44 (0)1273 930765 >> >>> On 15 Feb 2016, at 16:02, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> It might be used as well, but what about Data Pipe? Might be more >>> suggestive than "Xxx Proc"? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -- >>> Florent Georges >>> http://fgeorges.org/ >>> http://h2oconsulting.be/ >>> >>> >>> On 15 February 2016 at 16:53, James Fuller wrote: >>>> they may use it, but there is no registered trademark (as far as I >>>> can tell). >>>> >>>> On 15 February 2016 at 16:50, - - <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Unfortunately, "Dataproc" is already used by Google: >>>>> https://cloud.google.com/dataproc/ ... >>>>> >>>>> Alain Couthures >>>>> >>>>> Le 15 février 2016 à 15:39, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> a >>>>> écrit : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> At XML Prague Gerrit Imsieke, Alex Milowski, and I discussed with Nic >>>>> Gibson and he was amenable to the idea of chairing this community >>>>> group (in the short term). >>>>> >>>>> So I formally put forward Nic Gibson as chair candidate. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.w3.org/community/council/wiki/Templates/CG_Charter#Chair_Selection >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The proposed work items: >>>>> >>>>> * shepherd and drive XML syntax >>>>> >>>>> * gather corpus of use cases >>>>> >>>>> * rename XProc - the current suggestion is DataProc >>>>> >>>>> Jim Fuller >>>> >>> >> >> > -- Maximilian Gärber axxepta solutions GmbH Mühlstr. 10 88085 Langenargen Tel +49(0)7543 96 42 542 Mail gaerber@axxepta.de
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2016 08:54:04 UTC