- From: Nic Gibson <nicg@corbas.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:35:14 +0000
- To: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Cc: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>, public-datapipelining@w3.org
I’ve always been vaguely uncomfortable with the ‘Proc’ part of the name (think Proctology I guess). DataPipe is a managed hosting services provider. I think we should at least attempt to work out a name that is uncommon. nic -- Corbas Consulting / @CorbasLtd Digital Publishing Consultancy and Training http://www.corbas.co.uk, +44 (0)7718 906817/+44 (0)1273 930765 > On 15 Feb 2016, at 16:02, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > It might be used as well, but what about Data Pipe? Might be more > suggestive than "Xxx Proc"? > > Regards, > > -- > Florent Georges > http://fgeorges.org/ > http://h2oconsulting.be/ > > > On 15 February 2016 at 16:53, James Fuller wrote: >> they may use it, but there is no registered trademark (as far as I can tell). >> >> On 15 February 2016 at 16:50, - - <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> wrote: >>> Unfortunately, "Dataproc" is already used by Google: >>> https://cloud.google.com/dataproc/ ... >>> >>> Alain Couthures >>> >>> Le 15 février 2016 à 15:39, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> a écrit : >>> >>> >>> At XML Prague Gerrit Imsieke, Alex Milowski, and I discussed with Nic >>> Gibson and he was amenable to the idea of chairing this community >>> group (in the short term). >>> >>> So I formally put forward Nic Gibson as chair candidate. >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/community/council/wiki/Templates/CG_Charter#Chair_Selection >>> >>> The proposed work items: >>> >>> * shepherd and drive XML syntax >>> >>> * gather corpus of use cases >>> >>> * rename XProc - the current suggestion is DataProc >>> >>> Jim Fuller >> >
Received on Monday, 15 February 2016 18:35:47 UTC