- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:36:27 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Thanks a lot, Pano! Looks great so far. I will look deeper into this, but some quick feedback: - sh:focusNode and sh:targetNode can both carry either resources or literals. So I am afraid we cannot assume they are "@id" typed. Note that sh:focusNode is never entered directly but always machine-generated, so we don't need to worry about it, yet for sh:targetNode we need to keep it general. - Is it worth/possible to limit sh:minCount and the other xsd:integer properties to xsd:integer, so that either "1" or 1 can be used? - handling of sh:sourceConstraint is correct although it's never entered by a user. - Language maps look great for values that actually have a language, yet if this means that the syntax becomes inconsistent for those values that are plain xsd:strings, then I'd rather not use them. At this stage it's unclear how many people will use i18n values there anyway. Those that do can still add the @language tag for their local use. Having said this, further down you show how to use an alias ("pathList"), so maybe we could use "name" for sh:name and "names" for the lingual values? Holger On 7/03/2017 19:52, Pano Maria wrote: > I submitted a PR (https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/pull/30) with a > json-ld @context draft, including some examples. If time permits, we > could discuss it Wednesday. > > Kind regards, > Pano > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:02 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue > Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> shapes-ACTION-48: Produce a json-ld @context draft >> >> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/actions/48 >> >> Assigned to: Simon Steyskal >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2017 04:37:02 UTC