- From: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:25:26 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: Data Shapes WG <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Yes, I do apologize for the short notice and thank you for making the time. Would you be able to discuss these additional formal objects tomorrow as well? Any information you can send ahead of the meeting would be helpful. Irene > On Mar 7, 2017, at 5:19 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is extraordinarily short notice. However, I should be able to be at the > meeting. How should I make the appropriate audio and text connection? > > There are also several other major problems with the current definition of > SHACL. If they are not adequately fixed I expect to generate formal > objections for them as well. > > peter > > > On 03/07/2017 01:21 PM, Irene Polikoff wrote: >> Peter, >> >> We would like to invite you to tomorrow’s WG meeting to present your formal >> objections and to give the WG members an opportunity to ask you questions >> towards making sure that we fully understand your objections. >> >> Sandro Hawke advised us that the best way to ensure common understanding would >> be for someone other than you to write up the issues, then have you agree with >> the characterization in the write-up. To that end, I have put together the >> following page: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/FO-1:Removing_features_from_node_shapes >> >> Two more pages will be created later tonight. Btw, we have not heard from you >> regarding your objection to sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint. Should we assume >> that it still stands? >> >> We estimate that the discussion will take about 10-15 minutes of your time per >> issue. >> >> Please let me know if you will be able to attend. The meeting starts at 8 am ET. >> >> Regards, >> >> Irene
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2017 22:26:01 UTC