Re: call for review, and tracking comments

Dean,

I forwarded Sandro's announcement e-mail to a couple of people who I think may be able to report their plans to use or implement SHACL and may overlook the announcement otherwise. 

If you or anyone else on the WG knows of such parties, yes, I think it is a good idea to let them know individually.

Irene

> On Mar 2, 2017, at 12:09 PM, Dean Allemang <dallemang@workingontologist.com> wrote:
> 
> Should we re-publish this announcement individually to people we think might be interested?  e.g., to the FIBO technical team? 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org <mailto:sandro@w3.org>> wrote:
> Suggested plan:
> 
> * When we publish the new draft tomorrow and ask for review, we should include a prominent alert that:
> 
> (1) we are on a very short timeline and need comments by March 17th at the latest.
> (2) if you need more time than that, let us know what you need
> (3) if you've made earlier comments that you don't consider as having been addressed, please tell us again
> (4) we're especially interested in plans to implement
> 
> 
> * Moving forward we track comments carefully.   I kinda of like telling folks to use github, but we can stick with email + tracker + wiki.
> 
> Sound okay?   If we get a flood of interest, hopefully that will be taken as an encouraging sign we can use to negotiate a little more time on the CR transition deadline.
> 
>    -- Sandro
> 
> 
>