- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 07:12:39 -0500
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
I'm not sure, but I think this might be the answer: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2016AprJun/0069.html I'll keep trying to figure this out, but figured I'd give you this pointer, so maybe you can be looking in parallel. -- Sandro On 03/03/2017 01:28 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > I have included the suggested prose into the status of the document in > bold. > > I have just triggered ECHIDNA but it (once more) resulted in a > failure. This is a new error though that I have not see before: > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2017Mar/0017.html > > > "Only documents published under the 2015 process are supported at the > moment" > > Is this something you have seen before or know how to resolve? I am > not aware of recent changes that could cause this. > > Thanks, > Holger > > > On 3/03/2017 2:47, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> Suggested plan: >> >> * When we publish the new draft tomorrow and ask for review, we >> should include a prominent alert that: >> >> (1) we are on a very short timeline and need comments by March 17th >> at the latest. >> (2) if you need more time than that, let us know what you need >> (3) if you've made earlier comments that you don't consider as having >> been addressed, please tell us again >> (4) we're especially interested in plans to implement >> >> >> * Moving forward we track comments carefully. I kinda of like >> telling folks to use github, but we can stick with email + tracker + >> wiki. >> >> Sound okay? If we get a flood of interest, hopefully that will be >> taken as an encouraging sign we can use to negotiate a little more >> time on the CR transition deadline. >> >> -- Sandro >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 3 March 2017 12:12:46 UTC