(late) +1 it would have been good to have this one, maybe the next CG/WG Best, Dimtiris On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Ted Thibodeau Jr < tthibodeau@openlinksw.com> wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2017, at 12:51 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > > > Sounds good. Slight rephrase, keeping the spirit, I believe: > > This Working Group Note is intentionally left blank. It is intended to > replace the earlier Working Draft, *SHACL Core Abstract Syntax and > Semantics*, which documented a proposed design. That proposal did not > reach consensus within the Working Group and *does not reflect the final > design of SHACL*. That draft is retained only as a historical artifact > and should not be considered as describing SHACL in any way. > > If this works for you, please reply +1 now, thanks. > > > > +1 > > > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, http://aligned-project.eu Homepage: http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT
Received on Friday, 14 July 2017 10:33:46 UTC