public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from January 2017 by date

Tuesday, 31 January 2017

• WG Meeting 2017-02-01 Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ISSUE-222 (Pre-binding 2): Response to "On pre-binding" [SHACL - SPARQL] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 27 January 2017

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Dimitris Kontokostas
• SHACL draft ready for review Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Dimitris Kontokostas

Thursday, 26 January 2017

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
• My role in the ShEx CG Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Irene Polikoff
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Irene Polikoff
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 25 January 2017

• ISSUE-219: sh:xor added Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 24 January 2017

• WG meeting 2017-01-25 Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ISSUE-219 (One-of shapes): Should we add a one-of-a-list-of-shapes operator [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 19 January 2017

• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL] Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-92: Please review sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 18 January 2017

• Re: WG meeting 2017-01-18 Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: WG meeting 2017-01-18 Simon Steyskal

Tuesday, 17 January 2017

• WG meeting 2017-01-18 Holger Knublauch
• New version of SHACL specification Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? Irene Polikoff

Sunday, 15 January 2017

• Added auto-generated appendix with list of SHACL syntax rules Holger Knublauch

Friday, 13 January 2017

• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 12 January 2017

• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? Holger Knublauch
• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? Irene Polikoff
• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• ISSUE-170: EXISTS removed Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? Irene Polikoff

Wednesday, 11 January 2017

• Re: core remaining issues Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 10 January 2017

• WG Meeting 2017-01-11 Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-216: How to explain syntax rules for ill-formed shapes Holger Knublauch

Monday, 9 January 2017

• ISSUE-68: New proposal Holger Knublauch
• Proposed next steps (was: Re: core remaining issues) Dimitris Kontokostas

Saturday, 7 January 2017

• Re: core remaining issues Holger Knublauch

Friday, 6 January 2017

• update from W3 management Irene Polikoff
• Re: core remaining issues Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Process Question: How to clean up meeting minutes Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: core remaining issues Irene Polikoff
• core remaining issues Dimitris Kontokostas

Thursday, 5 January 2017

• Re: Process Question: How to clean up meeting minutes Holger Knublauch
• Re: Process Question: How to clean up meeting minutes Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Process Question: How to clean up meeting minutes Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 3 January 2017

• Re: WG Meeting 2017-01-04 Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: WG Meeting 2017-01-04 Holger Knublauch
• Re: WG Meeting 2017-01-04 Bart van Leeuwen
• Re: WG Meeting 2017-01-04 Holger Knublauch

Monday, 2 January 2017

• Re: WG Meeting 2017-01-04 Pano Maria
• WG Meeting 2017-01-04 Holger Knublauch

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 January 2017 08:52:25 UTC