- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:46:08 +1000
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Hi Peter, thanks for the next round of test cases as submitted here: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/pull/54 Among them are tests that verify that a SHACL Core implementation does not accidentally also handle SHACL-SPARQL features. In order to support such tests, I have added an optional flag to the test harness, as described here: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/abcf2cb9ab591870240d37ebabcaedcbf5f1bcbd In the commit above I have added such mf:requires triples to some of your tests. Please double-check that these changes reflect the intention of the test case. I then spent an hour or so trying to find the three subtle bugs in your next test case; fixed: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/2359a8704b078f4259a0eb0453f42afb563b7daf and then further time consuming errors, as fixed: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/4f46e168eeb99c8176dd9dc70c6efec88cc34e23 Please don't submit test cases unless you have run them yourself or otherwise ensured quality. Also the formatting of the source code is very poor, making it difficult to decipher. I have a lot of other things in my queue, such as the 11 new GitHub issues that you have submitted today. May I remind you of the "sloppiness" that you have complained about countless times while reviewing the SHACL spec? Holger
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 05:46:44 UTC