Re: an alternative proposal for partition

* Holger Knublauch <> [2016-08-11 17:14+1000]
> This looks like quite a mega feature, if sh:and and sh:or become overloaded
> with very different meaning, requiring a new execution algorithm etc. What
> about spawning this off into an extension, just like the SPARQL stuff is in
> an extension?

Persuing the extension idea (we explored the QCRs approach in another
thread): I've added a partition definition to the abstract syntax [1]
to define such an extension.

[1] <>

Doing so aligns ShEx and SHACL and allowing us to use the following
translation from ShEx to SHACL:

Without that, we don't know how to translate complex expressions with
choices or repeated properties.


office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +

Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.

Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2016 10:36:42 UTC