public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from November 2016 by date

Wednesday, 30 November 2016

Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 30 November 2016 Bart van Leeuwen
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 30 November 2016 Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] Dimitris Kontokostas
Summary of this week's edits Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

Re: Call to action Holger Knublauch
Re: WG Process (was Re: shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec)] Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Call to action Karen Coyle
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 30 November 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Call to action Arnaud Le Hors
Re: shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle

Monday, 28 November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] Dimitris Kontokostas
Call for Exclusions (update): SHACL Core Abstract Syntax and Semantics Xueyuan Jia
Re: shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch

Sunday, 27 November 2016

Saturday, 26 November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch

Friday, 25 November 2016

Thursday, 24 November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 23 November 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Call to action Holger Knublauch
Re: Call to action Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff
Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 23 November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff
Call to action Holger Knublauch
TopQuadrant's test cases added Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 22 November 2016

shapes-ISSUE-213 (Finding shapes): Finding shapes [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 November 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 16 November 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Review of editorial changes for the last two weeks Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-211 (property constraints): Eliminate property constraints [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-210 (Expected type): value types and expected types [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-207 (Parameters): Parameter descriptions for constraint components [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-205 (Validation report): Section 1.4 - graph is the result of validation [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-204 (Constraint node): Fourth node is unclear [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-203 (Constraint components): Constraint component is an IRI [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-200 (Processors/ing): [Editorial] Processors, processing not defined [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch

Monday, 21 November 2016

Sunday, 20 November 2016

shapes-ISSUE-211 (property constraints): Eliminate property constraints [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-210 (Expected type): value types and expected types [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-208 ($THIS): $this in aggregations [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-207 (Parameters): Parameter descriptions for constraint components [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-206 (Target node): Not clear how a node target specifies targets for a shape [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-205 (Validation report): Section 1.4 - graph is the result of validation [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-204 (Constraint node): Fourth node is unclear [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-203 (Constraint components): Constraint component is an IRI [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: ISSUE-188: Switched to "conforms" Karen Coyle

Saturday, 19 November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-199 (Constraint component IRIs): [Editorial] Constraint Component IRIs need to be defined before use [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-188: Switched to "conforms" Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-188: Switched to "conforms" Karen Coyle

Friday, 18 November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff
Re: shapes-ISSUE-199 (Constraint component IRIs): [Editorial] Constraint Component IRIs need to be defined before use [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-194: sh:stem implementation Karen Coyle
Re: IRC log? Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: IRC log? Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: IRC log? Arnaud Le Hors
Re: ISSUE-194: sh:stem implementation Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-194: sh:stem implementation Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-194: sh:stem implementation Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: shapes-ISSUE-199 (Constraint component IRIs): [Editorial] Constraint Component IRIs need to be defined before use [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-202 (Remove pre-binding from core): Suggestion to remove pre-binding from core [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-201 (node target): how does node target specify targets for a shape? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-194: sh:stem implementation Holger Knublauch
IRC log? Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-201 (node target): how does node target specify targets for a shape? [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff

Thursday, 17 November 2016

shapes-ISSUE-202 (Remove pre-binding from core): Suggestion to remove pre-binding from core [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-201 (node target): how does node target specify targets for a shape? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-200 (Processors/ing): [Editorial] Processors, processing not defined [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-199 (Constraint component IRIs): [Editorial] Constraint Component IRIs need to be defined before use [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Beware: Weekly meetings extended and starting at 8am ET for now Arnaud Le Hors
ISSUE-188: Switched to "conforms" Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 16 November 2016

shapes-ACTION-47: Review test suite and compare with shex tesst suite RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: shapes-ISSUE-196 (Delete filters): Should we delete filter shapes? [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
shapes-ISSUE-196 (Delete filters): Should we delete filter shapes? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 15 November 2016

Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax Karen Coyle
LIst of outstanding comments Karen Coyle
RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 16 November 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
shapes-ISSUE-195 (TTL File): [Editorial] Prepare TTL file for publication [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax Holger Knublauch
Re: Validation with "conforms" Holger Knublauch
Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax Karen Coyle
Validation with "conforms" Karen Coyle

Monday, 14 November 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 9 November 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax Holger Knublauch

Sunday, 13 November 2016

Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Remaining issues with impact on the syntax Karen Coyle
Proposal to close ISSUE-189 Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: Minimalist "validate" solution Dimitris Kontokostas

Friday, 11 November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-194 (valueStem): stems in value sets Dimitris Kontokostas
Remaining issues with impact on the syntax Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-194 (valueStem): stems in value sets Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 10 November 2016

Re: Minimalist "validate" solution Karen Coyle
Re: Issue-185 filter execution ordering Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: Issue-185 filter execution ordering Holger Knublauch
Re: Minimalist "validate" solution Dimitris Kontokostas
Issue-185 filter execution ordering Dimitris Kontokostas

Wednesday, 9 November 2016

Re: Introduction and SHACL implementation Holger Knublauch
shapes-ACTION-46: Propose changes to the definition of validation to close issue-185 RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Introduction and SHACL implementation Nicky van Oorschot

Tuesday, 8 November 2016

Re: Minimalist "validate" solution Karen Coyle
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 9 November 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 2 November 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
shapes-ISSUE-194 (valueStem): stems in value sets RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 7 November 2016

Re: [Editorial] Create section header for focus node Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions Holger Knublauch
[Editorial] Create section header for focus node Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-193 (Focus nodes): Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions Holger Knublauch
Re: Minimalist "validate" solution Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-193 (Focus nodes): Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 5 November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions Karen Coyle

Friday, 4 November 2016

Minimalist "validate" solution Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-193 (Focus nodes): Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change Karen Coyle
java implementation of ShEx Iovka Boneva
Re: shapes-ISSUE-193 (Focus nodes): Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-193 (Focus nodes): Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 3 November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions Holger Knublauch
Time of WG Weekly calls (again) Arnaud Le Hors
Re: shapes-ISSUE-193 (Focus nodes): Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-193 (Focus nodes): Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-193 (Focus nodes): Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-193 (Focus nodes): Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change Holger Knublauch
MUST vs is/are Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 2 November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions Karen Coyle
shapes-ACTION-45: Propose text for issue-192 RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ACTION-44: Fork an experiment without "validation" RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 2 November 2016 Arnaud Le Hors

Tuesday, 1 November 2016

Re: ISSUE-140: Suggestion to close Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-140: Suggestion to close Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-140: Suggestion to close Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-140: Suggestion to close Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-158: Request to review change Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-140: Suggestion to close Karen Coyle

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 November 2016 13:51:58 UTC