- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:32:00 +1000
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Just to let this group know of this little explorative activity: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemaorg/2016Mar/0077.html I already had some (SPIN) code in place to convert the raw schema.org RDFS into OWL, so I created a variation that translates that RDFS into SHACL, with some heuristics. schema.org doesn't include much machine-readable data yet that could be turned into formal constraints, so let's see if anyone is willing to suggest such extensions, or if it leads to any other helpful feedback. Note that I have used the generalized sh:or syntax proposed at https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/141 to represent mixed ranges - I believe this makes sense even if some people may obviously be skeptical about properties that may either take unstructured strings or well-structured resource. PS: I am traveling for the next week and may not be online each day. I will also miss the upcoming weekly call - apologies in advance. Hopefully some topics can be found where I am not too involved. Otherwise, my voting instructions are on the Proposals page. Regards, Holger
Received on Friday, 25 March 2016 09:32:35 UTC