- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:01:09 -0800
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2016 15:02:00 UTC
Thanks Peter. ISSUE-80 has nothing to do with this, it's just a bad copy/paste. Sorry for the confusion. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Cloud From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org Date: 03/17/2016 06:35 AM Subject: Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 17 March 2016 The pointer to ISSUE-65 is messed up. ISSUE-65 does not have that description. ISSUE-80 does have that description, but is probably not what is wanted. ISSUE-65 is about SHACL nomenclature (shape vs constraint) which is also not very relevant. There is a relevant issue - ISSUE-120, which is closed. I added pointers to all these issues. peter On 03/16/2016 08:14 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > Hi, > I apologize for sending this late but I just recovered power after several > hours (again!). > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2016.03.17 > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Cloud >
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2016 15:02:00 UTC