W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: rdf language tag contraints

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:51:49 -0800
Message-Id: <201603142151.u2ELpwKO015241@d01av01.pok.ibm.com>
To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net
Cc: Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote on 03/14/2016 02:41:43 PM:

> ISSUE-35 is closed. I think this needs to be a new issue, can refer to 
> ISSUE-35 outcome, and the message is: add this functionality to the 
> SHACL specification. (Arnaud, if this isn't the right procedure, pls 
> advise.)

This sounds good actually.
Thanks.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Cloud

> 
> kc
> 
> On 3/14/16 1:45 PM, Bart van Leeuwen wrote:
> > I'll pick it up,
> >
> > it is still related to ISSUE-35 right ?
> >
> > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
> > Bart van Leeuwen
> >
> > ##############################################################
> > # twitter: @semanticfire
> > # netage.nl
> > # http://netage.nl <http://netage.nl/>
> > # Esdoornstraat 3
> > # 3461ER Linschoten
> > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997
> > ##############################################################
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
> > To: Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
> > Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
> > Date: 14-03-2016 21:43
> > Subject: Re: rdf language tag contraints
> > 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > I believe we need an issue to make sure this gets discussed. I can
> > create that if you wish, or you can do it.
> >
> > kc
> >
> > On 3/14/16 9:17 AM, Bart van Leeuwen wrote:
> >  > Hi Karen,
> >  >
> >  > Thanks for the follow up, does this mean that a constrained in 
SHACL
> >  > should also be added ?
> >  >
> >  > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
> >  > Bart van Leeuwen
> >  >
> >  > ##############################################################
> >  > # twitter: @semanticfire
> >  > # netage.nl
> >  > # http://netage.nl <http://netage.nl/><http://netage.nl/>
> >  > # Esdoornstraat 3
> >  > # 3461ER Linschoten
> >  > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997
> >  > ##############################################################
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
> >  > To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
> >  > Date: 14-03-2016 15:44
> >  > Subject: Re: rdf language tag contraints
> >  > 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Bart, thanks. I followed up on the history and it was indeed voted 
to
> >  > become a requirement, but wasn't added. I will add it to the
> >  > requirements list in the UC&R.
> >  >
> >  > kc
> >  >
> >  > On 3/13/16 9:46 AM, Bart van Leeuwen wrote:
> >  >  > Hi All,
> >  >  >
> >  >  > Seeing all the productive discussions and positive vibe on the 
list I
> >  >  > sat down and read the current Editors draft of SHACL [1]
> >  >  >
> >  >  > One of the things that strike me is that I cannot have a simple
> >  >  > constraint on a language tag.
> >  >  >
> >  >  > e.g. I need rdfs:label with '@en' for my application.
> >  >  >
> >  >  > I do see a example in the "Native Constraints" section [2] but 
that
> >  >  > looks rather complex for my use case.
> >  >  > On the issue tracker I did find ISSUE-35 [3] which resolves in
> > allowing
> >  >  > constraints on the language tag.
> >  >  >
> >  >  > I tried searching the mailing list archive but 'Language' is so
> >  >  > ambiguous that it didn't help me answer this question from the
> > archive.
> >  >  >
> >  >  > Why is the use case mentioned in Issue 35 not there any more, 
and
> > why is
> >  >  > there no simple way constraint on the language of a literal?
> >  >  >
> >  >  > [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/
> >  >  > [2]
> > http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#an-example-native-constraint
> >  >  > [3] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/35
> >  >  >
> >  >  > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
> >  >  > Bart van Leeuwen
> >  >  >
> >  >  > ##############################################################
> >  >  > # twitter: @semanticfire
> >  >  > # netage.nl
> >  >  > # http://netage.nl
> > <http://netage.nl/><http://netage.nl/><http://netage.nl/>
> >  >  > # Esdoornstraat 3
> >  >  > # 3461ER Linschoten
> >  >  > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997
> >  >  > ##############################################################
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > Karen Coyle
> >  > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> > <http://kcoyle.net/><http://kcoyle.net/>
> >  > m: 1-510-435-8234
> >  > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >
> > --
> > Karen Coyle
> > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net <http://kcoyle.net/>
> > m: 1-510-435-8234
> > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
> >
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
> 
Received on Monday, 14 March 2016 21:52:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:30 UTC