- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 14:58:49 -0800
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
That's not suitable in a specification document. peter On 03/06/2016 02:55 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Fixed: > > https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/86dc939b2955eb153cf196f72735bbaee15ce94b > > > (like in other places, I assume that some details of the built-in vocabulary > such as ranges and domains are left to the separate SHACL vocabulary document). > > Thanks, > Holger > > > On 7/03/2016 4:39, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> shapes-ISSUE-124 (sh:group): sh:group is only mentioned in examples [SHACL - >> Core] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/124 >> >> Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider >> On product: SHACL - Core >> >> There is no description of sh:group in the SHACL document. It is only used >> in an example. >> >> >> > >
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2016 22:59:20 UTC