- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 21:20:39 -0800
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 3/1/16 10:11 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > in a simple extension of the current SHACL RDF syntax this would be > > [ a sh:propertyConstraint ; > sh:predicate ex:p ; > sh:minCount 1 ; > sh:class ex:c ; > sh:maxCount 5 ; > sh:class ex:d ; > sh:minCount 3 ] Doesn't this require that there be order among the triples? Otherwise, how do the two minCount's apply to the correct sh:Class triple? kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 05:21:04 UTC