public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from July 2016 by date

Friday, 29 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 28 July 2016 Arnaud Le Hors

Thursday, 28 July 2016

Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax Karen Coyle
Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax Andy Seaborne
Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax Eric Prud'hommeaux
ISSUE-150: nested severities Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax Karen Coyle

Wednesday, 27 July 2016

Re: Updates to Abstract Syntax Holger Knublauch
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 July 2016 Holger Knublauch
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 July 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Updates to Abstract Syntax Karen Coyle
Proposal to close ISSUE-134 (Does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints)_ Dimitris Kontokostas

Friday, 22 July 2016

shapes-ISSUE-175 (scope naming): Alternate naming for term for scope / in-scope [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 21 July 2016 Arnaud Le Hors

Thursday, 21 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 21 July 2016 Arnaud Le Hors

Tuesday, 19 July 2016

Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples Holger Knublauch

Monday, 18 July 2016

Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-139: Compromise Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-139: Compromise Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 16 July 2016

Re: ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples Karen Coyle

Friday, 15 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 14 July 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] Irene Polikoff
Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] Karen Coyle

Thursday, 14 July 2016

ISSUE-133: Wiki page with syntax examples Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] Irene Polikoff
Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] Karen Coyle
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 July 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: List of open SHACL Core Syntax ISSUEs Holger Knublauch
Re: List of open SHACL Core Syntax ISSUEs Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] Dimitris Kontokostas

Wednesday, 13 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 7 July 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: $variables Karen Coyle

Tuesday, 12 July 2016

Re: $variables Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] Dimitris Kontokostas
List of open SHACL Core Syntax ISSUEs Holger Knublauch
Re: $variables Karen Coyle
Re: $variables Karen Coyle

Monday, 11 July 2016

Re: $variables Andy Seaborne
Re: $variables Karen Coyle
Re: $variables Andy Seaborne
shapes-ISSUE-174 (Scopenode): Scopenode does not use RDF node definition [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 9 July 2016

Re: $variables Karen Coyle
Re: $variables Arnaud Le Hors
Re: $variables Holger Knublauch

Friday, 8 July 2016

Re: $variables Irene Polikoff
Re: $variables Karen Coyle
Re: $variables Karen Coyle
Re: $variables Irene Polikoff
Re: $variables Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: $variables Karen Coyle
Re: $variables Irene Polikoff
Re: $variables Arnaud Le Hors
Re: shapes-ISSUE-158 (ill-typed literals and sh:datatype): ill-typed literals do not always trigger a validation result [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
Re: $variables Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: $variables Arnaud Le Hors
shapes-ISSUE-173 (Hiding SPARQL): [Editorial] Text related to SPARQL definitions needs to be hidden together with query [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: $variables Karen Coyle

Thursday, 7 July 2016

Re: $variables Holger Knublauch
Re: $variables Karen Coyle
Re: $variables Holger Knublauch
$variables Karen Coyle
Categorization of constraint components Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action Karen Coyle
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 7 July 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action Karen Coyle

Wednesday, 6 July 2016

ISSUE-166: Suggestion to close without action Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-65 and ISSUE-111: Could IMHO be closed Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-132: Can be closed Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-41: Progress Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 5 July 2016

Sunday, 3 July 2016

Re: abstract syntax for SHACL Holger Knublauch
Re: abstract syntax for SHACL Karen Coyle
Re: question on sh:NodeConstraint Holger Knublauch
Re: abstract syntax for SHACL Holger Knublauch

Friday, 1 July 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 30 June 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
question on sh:NodeConstraint Iovka Boneva
Fwd: Re: Improving EXISTS Andy Seaborne
Re: shapes-ISSUE-172 (sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition): the sh:nodeKind SPARQL definition is unnecessarily complex [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Last message date: Friday, 29 July 2016 16:31:37 UTC