public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from December 2016 by date

Tuesday, 20 December 2016

• Re: (cancelled) RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 December 2016 Irene Polikoff
• Re: (cancelled) RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 December 2016 Dean Allemang
• (cancelled) RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 December 2016 Andy Seaborne

Monday, 19 December 2016

• Re: DCMI decision on Data Shapes Solbrig, Harold R., M.S.
• RDF Data Shapes WG resignation Arnaud Le Hors

Sunday, 18 December 2016

• Re: DCMI decision on Data Shapes Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: Call to action Dean Allemang

Saturday, 17 December 2016

• DCMI decision on Data Shapes Karen Coyle
• Re: ISSUE-211: Should we turn sh:property and sh:sparql into constraint components? Holger Knublauch

Friday, 16 December 2016

• Making the SPARQL parts "smaller" Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-211: Should we turn sh:property and sh:sparql into constraint components? Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 15 December 2016

• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 14 December 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 13 December 2016

• Summary of edits from the last two weeks Holger Knublauch
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 (not 13!) December 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 13 December 2016 Simon Steyskal
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 13 December 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 Holger Knublauch
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 Irene Polikoff

Monday, 12 December 2016

• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 Irene Polikoff
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 Karen Coyle
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Please vote on ISSUE-211 Karen Coyle
• Please vote on ISSUE-211 Arnaud Le Hors

Sunday, 11 December 2016

• Re: [Issue 170] Update on EXISTS Andy Seaborne
• [Issue 170] Update on EXISTS Andy Seaborne

Friday, 9 December 2016

• WG Outlook Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] Andy Seaborne
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Holger Knublauch
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Dimitris Kontokostas
• shapes-ISSUE-217 (Path vs predicate clean up): Further clean up of paths versus predicate [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 8 December 2016

• Re: proposal for issue-211 Karen Coyle
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Irene Polikoff
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Dimitris Kontokostas

Wednesday, 7 December 2016

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Irene Polikoff
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Holger Knublauch
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Irene Polikoff
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Irene Polikoff
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Karen Coyle
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: proposal for issue-211 Holger Knublauch
• proposal for issue-211 Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle

Tuesday, 6 December 2016

• Re: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 Holger Knublauch
• Re: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 Pano Maria
• Re: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch

Monday, 5 December 2016

• Re: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle

Saturday, 3 December 2016

• RE: Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 Simon Steyskal
• Potential WG telecon 2016-12-07 Holger Knublauch

Friday, 2 December 2016

• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 30 November 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
• Use is/are for SHACL and MUST for processors / remaining issues Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff

Thursday, 1 December 2016

• Re: Added class diagram Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: Added class diagram Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Irene Polikoff
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
• Added class diagram Holger Knublauch

Last message date: Tuesday, 20 December 2016 14:12:15 UTC