public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from November 2015 by date

Friday, 27 November 2015

Re: Regrets for next 2 weeks Dimitris Kontokostas

Thursday, 26 November 2015

Re: Regrets for next 2 weeks Solbrig, Harold R., M.S.
Regrets for next 2 weeks Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 25 November 2015

Re: shapes-ISSUE-114 (Property Groups): Should SHACL include a grouping mechanism of properties (for UI purposes) [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ISSUE-114 (Property Groups): Should SHACL include a grouping mechanism of properties (for UI purposes) [SHACL Spec] Simon Steyskal
Re: shapes-ISSUE-114 (Property Groups): Should SHACL include a grouping mechanism of properties (for UI purposes) [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle

Tuesday, 24 November 2015

Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 19 November 2015 Arthur Ryman
shapes-ACTION-31: Create shacl-vocab.ttl and generate HTML as per resolution of ISSUE-87 RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 21 November 2015

ISSUE-23: Another attempt to compromise Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-114 (Property Groups): Should SHACL include a grouping mechanism of properties (for UI purposes) [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-114 (Property Groups): Should SHACL include a grouping mechanism of properties (for UI purposes) [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
Constraints metamodel draft (was: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications) Holger Knublauch

Friday, 20 November 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 19 November 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 19 November 2015

Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications Arthur Ryman
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 November 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 12 November 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: connecting ISSUE-65 (Nomenclature) to other issues Arthur Ryman
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 November 2015 Arthur Ryman
Re: connecting ISSUE-65 (Nomenclature) to other issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: connecting ISSUE-65 (Nomenclature) to other issues Arthur Ryman
Re: shapes-ISSUE-114 (Property Groups): Should SHACL include a grouping mechanism of properties (for UI purposes) [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 12 November 2015 Arthur Ryman
ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications Arthur Ryman

Wednesday, 18 November 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 November 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Are we running out of time? Arnaud Le Hors

Tuesday, 17 November 2015

well-formed Shape Expressions Schemas Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Are we running out of time? Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Shape Expressions Schemas (was Re: ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft) Iovka Boneva
Re: ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 16 November 2015

Re: ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft Iovka Boneva

Sunday, 15 November 2015

Re: Shape Expressions Schemas (was Re: ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft) Arthur Ryman

Saturday, 14 November 2015

Re: Are we running out of time? (was: shapes-ISSUE-113 (SHACL and user interfaces): [SHACL Spec]) Arnaud Le Hors

Friday, 13 November 2015

Re: shapes-ISSUE-113 (SHACL and user interfaces): [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? Holger Knublauch
Re: UI/UX snippets Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-112: Proposal using sh:name and sh:description Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-113 (SHACL and user interfaces): [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Irene Polikoff
Re: ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? Arthur Ryman
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Arthur Ryman
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Irene Polikoff
Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? Nick Crossley
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Arthur Ryman
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Arthur Ryman
Re: UI/UX snippets Bart van Leeuwen
Re: UI/UX snippets Bart van Leeuwen
Are we running out of time? (was: shapes-ISSUE-113 (SHACL and user interfaces): [SHACL Spec]) Holger Knublauch
Shape Expressions Schemas (was Re: ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: shapes-ISSUE-113 (SHACL and user interfaces): [SHACL Spec] Arnaud Le Hors
Re: shapes-ISSUE-113 (SHACL and user interfaces): [SHACL Spec] Arnaud Le Hors
Re: UI/UX snippets Arnaud Le Hors
Re: shapes-ISSUE-113 (SHACL and user interfaces): [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
connecting ISSUE-65 (Nomenclature) to other issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: UI/UX snippets Holger Knublauch
Re: UI/UX snippets Arnaud Le Hors
Re: UI/UX snippets Karen Coyle

Thursday, 12 November 2015

Re: UI/UX snippets Holger Knublauch
shapes-ISSUE-114 (Property Groups): Should SHACL include a grouping mechanism of properties (for UI purposes) [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 12 November 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: UI/UX snippets Bart van Leeuwen
shapes-ISSUE-113 (SHACL and user interfaces): [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-92: Possible compromise Holger Knublauch
UI/UX snippets Ted Thibodeau Jr
Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Irene Polikoff
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Arthur Ryman
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Irene Polikoff
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Arthur Ryman
Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Arthur Ryman
Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? Arthur Ryman
Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman
Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman
Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism Arthur Ryman
Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? Arthur Ryman
ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft Arthur Ryman
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 November 2015 Arthur Ryman
Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman
Re: shapes-ISSUE-104 (Union ranges): Should sh:datatype and sh:class have better support for OR? [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman

Wednesday, 11 November 2015

Tuesday, 10 November 2015

Monday, 9 November 2015

Saturday, 7 November 2015

Re: Can we freeze the Tracker for while? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Can we freeze the Tracker for while? Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 6 November 2015

Thursday, 5 November 2015

Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-111 (charter issues): How should the working group address the issues called out in the WG charter? RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-104 (Union ranges): Should sh:datatype and sh:class have better support for OR? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2015 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2015 Karen Coyle
Re: Interaction between minCount and hasValue Arthur Ryman
Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Arthur Ryman
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 29 October 2015 Arthur Ryman
Re: Core SHACL Semantics http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ Arthur Ryman
Re: Core SHACL Semantics http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ Arthur Ryman
Re: shapes-ISSUE-104 (Union ranges): Should sh:datatype and sh:class have better support for OR? [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman
Re: Interaction between minCount and hasValue Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
Re: Interaction between minCount and hasValue Holger Knublauch
Interaction between minCount and hasValue Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2015 Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2015 Arnaud Le Hors

Wednesday, 4 November 2015

Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-110 (single-property constraints): relationship between sh:constraint and sh:property and sh:inverseProperty Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
shapes-ISSUE-110 (single-property constraints): relationship between sh:constraint and sh:property and sh:inverseProperty RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2015 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Holger Knublauch
Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
shapes-ISSUE-109 (function calling): SHACL requires that SPARQL implementations be able to call functions defined on the fly [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 29 October 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: ACTION-29 Z Specification for the W3C Editor's Draft Core SHACL Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ACTION-29 Z Specification for the W3C Editor's Draft Core SHACL Semantics Arthur Ryman
Re: shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ACTION-29 Z Specification for the W3C Editor's Draft Core SHACL Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Core SHACL Semantics http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ACTION-29 "Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages" v2 Arthur Ryman
Re: ACTION-29 "Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages" v2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
ACTION-29 Issues found in your draft of Core SHACL Semantics Arthur Ryman
ACTION-29 Z Specification for the W3C Editor's Draft Core SHACL Semantics Arthur Ryman
ACTION-29 "Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages" v2 Arthur Ryman

Tuesday, 3 November 2015

Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 2 November 2015

Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Irene Polikoff
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Karen Coyle
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Irene Polikoff
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Holger Knublauch
Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Karen Coyle
Re: shapes-ACTION-30: Send email to group with unclear "satisfied by's" Karen Coyle

Sunday, 1 November 2015

Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Holger Knublauch

Last message date: Friday, 27 November 2015 13:32:14 UTC