W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: shapes-ISSUE-25 (core/lite): What's in Core/Lite? [SHACL Spec]

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:27:27 -0700
Message-ID: <5519A39F.6050701@gmail.com>
To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

If the extension mechanism is shoved into a dusty corner then it matters a
lot what is in core/lite.  If, however, SHACL includes a construct that can
express lots of things that is truly part of SHACL, then it matters a lot
less what is in core/lite.   If SHACL includes a construct to define new
high-level constructs then what is in core/lite is pretty much a matter of
taste.

peter


On 03/28/2015 01:16 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-25 (core/lite): What's in Core/Lite? [SHACL Spec]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/25
> 
> Raised by: Richard Cyganiak On product: SHACL Spec
> 
> Assuming that SHACL includes an extension mechanism that can be used to
> express pretty much anything, which constructs will be in the high-level
> Core/Lite part of the language that can be used without the extension
> mechanism?
> 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVGaOfAAoJECjN6+QThfjzmYsH/167vkA7bx7IkXvOkmWrfl76
lm3EPRKYXBSWdI1KRu2DpoLc/4sv2PQlI1bmXeqaA9n58DhqSulfppuWBK6825BY
SsRyNPsaZUap9p5TCQAL8lyj6frV9XM9dWh/b9Ccv7ygwQUpU4q/qOqOEYh4e8UL
Ah1ZDrN+0d39xfFLr4O4EdeLEEJ1OMnjAVAIGQxNI3XptNtP79UchtOan1scKfGX
3YfShJZnxuZMvUdKNwFUuSAU7E0J/nSJfzavpA6n3EvTRGDaFuDrAhdAZB1X/hjz
ErWw+HGiQLQP+DUf0/a8g2x6NlshgYt3U2k5cpdRVgx8Hjr76w+dQLMZWHBEcPE=
=d+xT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 19:28:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC