shapes-ISSUE-32 (SHACL+-): SHACL = high-level + extensions ? [SHACL Spec] from RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker on 2015-03-28 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2015)

From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 20:39:07 +0000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1YbxVb-00009I-5c@deneb.w3.org>

shapes-ISSUE-32 (SHACL+-): SHACL = high-level + extensions ? [SHACL Spec]

http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/32

Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider
On product: SHACL Spec

Is SHACL going to be a high-level language with an extension mechanism as an add-on or is SHACL going to be a single language with some portion of it designated as the simple portion?

Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 20:39:07 UTC