shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] from RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker on 2015-03-28 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2015)

From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 20:17:11 +0000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1YbxAN-000GsB-L3@deneb.w3.org>

shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec]

http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/26

Raised by: Richard Cyganiak
On product: SHACL Spec

It looks like SHACL will be split into two parts:

1) A high-level “Core/Lite” language consisting of things like cardinality constraints, datatype constraints, conjunctions and disjunctions
2) An extension mechanism that relies on embedded expressions in a more expressive language

Can the embedded expressions in 2) invoke named expressions defined using 1)?

Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 20:17:12 UTC