Re: Naming of cardinality properties

+1 on sh:minCount, sh:maxCount, but to me sh:count doesn't express what 
it means. I'd leave it off.

kc

On 3/26/15 11:20 PM, Michel Dumontier wrote:
> +1 on sh:minCount, sh:maxCount, and sh:count
>
> m
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Mar 26, 2015, at 11:05 PM, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> Another question on the vocabulary. Does anyone object to using sh:minCount, sh:maxCount? If so, what would be the alternatives? I personally find sh:minCardinality too long, and sh:minCard too unclear.
>>
>> Shall we support sh:count as a short-cut for the case where min/maxCount are equal? The main use case of that would be sh:count = 1, and this is quite a common case. On the downside, it adds a bit complexity to the engines as there are multiple ways to state the same thing.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Holger
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 14:40:57 UTC