Naming of cardinality properties

Another question on the vocabulary. Does anyone object to using 
sh:minCount, sh:maxCount? If so, what would be the alternatives? I 
personally find sh:minCardinality too long, and sh:minCard too unclear.

Shall we support sh:count as a short-cut for the case where min/maxCount 
are equal? The main use case of that would be sh:count = 1, and this is 
quite a common case. On the downside, it adds a bit complexity to the 
engines as there are multiple ways to state the same thing.

Thanks
Holger

Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 06:07:06 UTC