Re: recursive shapes in SHACL

Hmm, I don't think you answered my question :)

Holger


On 3/25/2015 20:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> If recursive shapes are forbidden, then it is possible to do away with
> query-execution-time treatment of shape inclusions in favour of a
> macro-expansion treatment of shape inclusion.
>
> peter
>
>
> On 03/24/2015 08:26 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>> On 3/25/2015 12:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>> One way forward is to forbid recursive shapes.
>> Do you suggest to remove sh:valueShape completely, or only mark it
>> recursion illegal in the specification? In the latter case, we would
>> still need to give advice to implementers on what to do if it encounters
>> an illegal situation (to prevent infinite loops etc).
>>
>> Holger
>>
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVEoeQAAoJECjN6+QThfjz71QH/0WKzBeFMJ4DtN5dI3/c7x49
> 1zcPt1JpaLhR+6yr0TbF2lhG+JNFL9qRSJGW+4pfB0cpgObG/0X3wP1dFXzbwVh8
> 6vhbgjfLOSaJ+V+hYVa5e6ODkSXBNmH4neXxA0iXYY6KbFQT2kswk9WCbCGrmogc
> nOH9KRbJaGebc88qrgRhzGfp2hxUnuXptmczzB9E9U9NWfEzCzf6atS/RVp3QKv+
> yufEt1BcqzfZK8N6Xfovrsejt48QU89f5PYPCkf/4kcmd09WgmKSkn168Dpe2Exk
> pNLleIseE3US45R8uTuFqLlSgcTCn0HEFncDScF8E36Hmr0u1eB0v3vx7PZ1I/U=
> =zoAx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2015 23:22:25 UTC