W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: is there an implementation of Shape Expressions that correctly handles recursive shapes?

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:10:27 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20150324221026.GA10504@w3.org>
* Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2015-03-22 10:37-0700]
> That's working better now.  At least we are getting to the Shape Expressions
> problems.
> 
> I have attached two screen shots showing different behaviour on the same graph.

I've added a bit to note inconsistencies between different models. I
don't know of a real answer to a two-party liars' paradox, but you may
find the disclosures more revealing and consistent.

http://www.w3.org/2013/ShEx/FancyShExDemo?starting-nodes=ex%3Ab%20ex%3Ac&schema=PREFIX%20ex%3A%20%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fex.example%2F%23%3E%0Astart%3D%3CT%3E%0A%3CT%3E%20%7B%20ex%3Aq%20.%20%7C%20ex%3Ar%20%40%3CT%3E%20%7D%0A&data=PREFIX%20ex%3A%20%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fex.example%2F%23%3E%0Aex%3Ab%20ex%3Aq%20ex%3Az%20.%0Aex%3Ab%20ex%3Ar%20ex%3Ac%20.%0Aex%3Ac%20ex%3Aq%20ex%3Az%20.%0Aex%3Ac%20ex%3Ar%20ex%3Ab%20.&colorize=true

BTW, since the browser-dependent bugs appear to have subsided,
you probably only need to send me a permalinks.


> peter




-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 22:10:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC