recursive shapes in SHACL from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2015-03-24 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2015)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:35:37 -0700
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <55118449.1040808@gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I believe that the current design of SHACL
(https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/) will make recursive shapes very
problematic.

Both variations in
http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#sparql-AbstractValueShapePropertyConst
raint
do not work correctly. (Consider how the designs would work on the SHACL
versions of the examples in
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2015Mar/0377.html.)

Does anyone have a proposal on how to handle recursive shapes that does not
give rise to difficulties?


peter

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVEYRJAAoJECjN6+QThfjzKnsIAIJrI9dGR076qUc0FesGLqXy
86m8sE5FaSRlwO6v/vaKNBl/GvMP6o6qMibjRjFR/YOfUK7p19KIClqj8XSB07kz
zIF04i9HRoqeCcb4CRZoNlqV6OKND7SyfHB0pDdccYh2g8kvLIk1/60DtUXt0599
n0tPPzmPLdkOSLsMmiklCFnvthj0tEY+l6lWG7tOKDrupQTQCbIgnQ/bOU6Xrv+B
pJExCrEdSvURYL1z9/BsGlz431X91Ga97J0hmhe842Mi79Dd2zk7VkKXurRKJm63
Z2EPBz9TD0P0dzxh/JcszDCxRND+G3C7oRPglfc1RP5+P1Zd3QqNltpIIQSh6J4=
=c37i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 15:36:09 UTC