- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:48:53 +0000
- To: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
- Cc: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
> On 23 Mar 2015, at 09:59, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com> wrote: > > Because there is not a clear separation between the high-level language constructs and the SPARQL definitions. My main point is that we have to separate one from the other so we can also define the semantics by other means. What is the benefit of defining the semantics by other means than SPARQL? Richard
Received on Monday, 23 March 2015 13:49:17 UTC