W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Implementation feasibility

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 18:21:26 -0700
Message-ID: <550E1916.3080700@gmail.com>
To: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
CC: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/21/2015 12:11 PM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo wrote:
>>> 
>>>> There are several implementations for ShEx, which is a similar 
>>>> language to the one described there.
>> 
>> ShEx has exclusive or, the core has inclusive or.  This is a
>> significant difference.
>> 
>> 
>> It has already been said that the people behind ShEx are also members
>> of this WG and that we are open to adapt the language.
> 
> What does this have to do with the differences between ShEx and the
> SHACL core?
> 
> 
> Because you are saying that there is a significant difference between
> ShEx and SHACL and I say that the people behind ShEx are flexible enough
> to adapt what has been proposed for ShEx to SHACL.

This also does not, by itself, mean that implementations of ShEx demonstrate
implementation feasibility of the core of SHACL.

> As an example, I am more inclined to have both inclusive and exclusive
> or, so the user can chose which one depending on its validation needs.

I'm not sure how adding features makes the core of SHACL more implementable.

> Best regards, Jose Labra

peter

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVDhkWAAoJECjN6+QThfjzOQkH/RZH+BSOEAJluWFHSzscaPnK
jJ1GS4XLCgKT5eOboZBhMUSMiiiI2jRRX3eZ7NEyJttGyo4AEfTzLwQSIjAEiUIt
pIvjOu+XIRt1g27/yKQVkXNniONu8aHtGqXYLWZZTNXwbM6FeNVXDop0VWbsRYf1
Ao+dUmsaDtsnsuzFH3kzAur+2L5lLkvyBxz+EpRzq9phOYYpEj3xvtDLz/+PP2uU
KCSLxWHeD4No6Wg3A31mK/HHqV5AgmIriXsATRM9523OQm1z2K/nAqrvw1acWQ90
HJkwwJuWi3ZU99pS58afR7fSi9e0czNeb/5GLHqZi2HGCt8q8K7STGJyqb9afiI=
=T5J7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sunday, 22 March 2015 01:21:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC