W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: shacl.shacl.ttl

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:46:29 -0400
To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20150321174627.GA1265@w3.org>
* Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> [2015-03-21 09:35-0700]
> I am only aware of one defined ontology for shacl, shacl.shacl.ttl
> [1] which is linked from Holger's document.
> 
> Are there others?
> 
> Is there agreement on this ontology? Do other proposals (e.g. Jose's
> and Eric's) assume this as the SHACL ontology?

Here's a shacl defn from the primer:
  http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-primer/shacl.ttl


> (Note: as some of us -- well, me, at least -- are having a hard time
> keeping track of all of the various proposals, could links be added
> to them on the main page, perhaps under
> #Useful_Working_Group_Wiki_pages_and_documents. Thanks.)

Done.


> kc
> 
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/shacl.shacl.ttl
> -- 
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
> 

-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Saturday, 21 March 2015 17:46:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC