W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Pragmatic Proposal for the Structure of the SHACL Spec

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 09:07:07 -0700
Message-ID: <550D972B.7080905@kcoyle.net>
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org

On 3/19/15 7:44 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> By the way I have also restructured the Overview of the Core Features so
> that it is only about *local* constraints. I have moved *global*
> constraints to the second half.

My gut feeling is that the global constraints will be used most often 
with the least complex data, and therefore should be in the core.

I don't see language that states how to define the desired focus node in 
the SHACL language, and that should be very early on in the document. Is 
this because we do not have agreement on that? If so, I would like there 
be a placeholder, probably in section 3, Shapes. This would define local 
and global shapes.

BTW, the term "local shapes" does not appear anywhere in the document yet.

kc



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Saturday, 21 March 2015 16:07:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC