W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Implementation feasibility

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:31:51 -0700
Message-ID: <550D8EE7.1080308@gmail.com>
To: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
CC: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 03/20/2015 10:16 PM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo wrote:
>> 
>>> There are several implementations for ShEx, which is a similar
>>> language to the one described there.
> 
> ShEx has exclusive or, the core has inclusive or.  This is a significant 
> difference.
> 
> 
> It has already been said that the people behind ShEx are also members of
> this WG and that we are open to adapt the language.

What does this have to do with the differences between ShEx and the SHACL
core?

peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVDY7nAAoJECjN6+QThfjzq4cIANXuMSYq1zQXLF4MDyIHiTlr
w/9qYvplltB8pYWzTGdl97X3ThvxFfJzL2rIPgpSh8YFlkpUfCIXp/wNtqTP5nnr
YO70tumDEK9J0xDokG36DBYzzoG7X0jcBeFhQoesft8c1KNplCl32ZL8erGZNLme
v88BGh2jlo6qdBia37ZvkKUQ1OBmQk/hmk8GIh4UuKev3A09brgtJlsVilJ+UKUj
zeqBSCK8hsV2BUDMXc4ScN5jTuQ3yFgnuhfYHCJLjE7HQfe/T6E2ogYsl03/ltNs
imNiDvLXzJOOxWAlXLT8pfHXyUK3BKNegx/COzHcu24WEE25PkF9bdYeyChDw9g=
=185E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Saturday, 21 March 2015 15:32:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC