Re: Implementation feasibility

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 03/20/2015 10:16 PM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo wrote:
>> 
>>> There are several implementations for ShEx, which is a similar
>>> language to the one described there.
> 
> ShEx has exclusive or, the core has inclusive or.  This is a significant 
> difference.
> 
> 
> It has already been said that the people behind ShEx are also members of
> this WG and that we are open to adapt the language.

What does this have to do with the differences between ShEx and the SHACL
core?

peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVDY7nAAoJECjN6+QThfjzq4cIANXuMSYq1zQXLF4MDyIHiTlr
w/9qYvplltB8pYWzTGdl97X3ThvxFfJzL2rIPgpSh8YFlkpUfCIXp/wNtqTP5nnr
YO70tumDEK9J0xDokG36DBYzzoG7X0jcBeFhQoesft8c1KNplCl32ZL8erGZNLme
v88BGh2jlo6qdBia37ZvkKUQ1OBmQk/hmk8GIh4UuKev3A09brgtJlsVilJ+UKUj
zeqBSCK8hsV2BUDMXc4ScN5jTuQ3yFgnuhfYHCJLjE7HQfe/T6E2ogYsl03/ltNs
imNiDvLXzJOOxWAlXLT8pfHXyUK3BKNegx/COzHcu24WEE25PkF9bdYeyChDw9g=
=185E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Saturday, 21 March 2015 15:32:21 UTC