- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:01:44 -0700
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- CC: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>, kcoyle@kcoyle.net, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/20/2015 04:05 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Arnaud, > >> On 20 Mar 2015, at 00:05, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> the possible problem you're pointing out has to do with having >> different people work independently rather than having multiple >> documents. The same would be true if we had one document with various >> sections independently edited by different people. > > You’re hitting the nail on the head. > > The problem is that this WG has different people working independently. I don't see this as the current problem in the working group. What I see as the current problem is that there is no agreement on how to evaluate the work being done. Some working group members believe that it is better to build a core language with little or no work being done to determine whether the core can be expanded to cover the rest of the working group's requirements. Other working group members believe that it is better to build a full language and only later determine what should be in the core. Each of these sides does not view the issues put forward by the other side as being important. [...] > Richard peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVDAwnAAoJECjN6+QThfjzVXkH/2chkCaM3xfWxxdifyQAwTQD AZPfTA0j6YAbbEL4VG++rPGU0p63GH1aqMXuIjCrHZ7ogNvaP6Vt0pOkyPfFEzlA VP+A6KqNpQ3VrHZPvt2HaOCNqVc6fG/gMeS723cU0Il5CvL7hcaFRpbnMgaEK1eu vxC0Me+yNKdX2ZyILW9SdpbZwLbkOdaCPxmd+BxIz4QRCghz8l0ekMu8Sh+FzCp8 MsUbEYRgV9yR9xVg6mJGLYIlS433U514qCRnIb5VJfZcIpB3Ro0+GkESYQ7c6UYW C/N6LfmGSwGNbRsyMQ41C5AuB8wsGwhdyYLoCKn2hRTr6SchNE8WCkltraVCRGM= =bqDd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 12:02:14 UTC