- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:49:39 -0700
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 3/15/15 6:15 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > [[ > SHACL (Shapes Constraint Language) provides structural constraints for > RDF graphs. SHACL constraints are grouped into "shapes", which may > also be referenced by constraints in other shapes. These constraints > describe the triples connecting certain nodes in the graph. SHACL can > constrain the number of triples with a particular predicate and the > permitted object datatype or object terms, require that the subject or > object match some shape or lexical and datatype conditions. > ]] I'm still having trouble with "structural" and "provides" -- is there a reason not to use "SHACL can be used to formulate constraints..." which reprises the SPARQL opening? kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 14:50:09 UTC