W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: SHACL semantics - any alternatives to SPARQL?

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 09:50:22 +1000
Message-ID: <54FA3D3E.10404@topquadrant.com>
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 3/7/15 2:38 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> I'm one of the members of the working group that have been voicing and 
> writing disapprovals, but I'm certainly not the only one.

Yes and I believe I have addressed your recent comments. I have 
integrated the scope feature, clarified the wording around SPARQL and 
clearly marked TODO items and ISSUES where we disagree for now. But 
overall these disagreements appear rather minor to me and include things 
that can and will be discussed further.

Overall, I think this WG could use some input from other people than the 
handful of very vocal members. I think feedback from the outside would 
help. We also need more real-time conversations within the group. I 
don't think we are all that far apart from each other, but these emails 
always focus on the differences rather than the commonalities.

Cheers,
Holger
Received on Friday, 6 March 2015 23:50:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:17 UTC