W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

SHACL semantics - any alternatives to SPARQL?

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:16:54 -0800
Message-ID: <54F94656.3050703@gmail.com>
To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

It seems that the working group is supposed to be pushing towards
publication of a SHACL specification document in the near future.   Does
anyone have any alternatives to a SPARQL-based semantics for SHACL that they
would like to put forward?

Yes, I am aware that there are three potential semantics from the Shape
Expressions community that might be alternatives, but is anyone going to
champion either the current version of one of these semantics or have a
modified version available in time for consideration by the working group?

peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU+UZWAAoJECjN6+QThfjz1WkIAMSruKupbQjCk4nTjSTkEvA0
pA8tdqYkubYUtaIDG1hS8z9SET2YydURneK6qYJMvkCHXzVupUZ/74L9PDzgm2uC
QKyOnI3IgywHzXgU+LXTWbdyxVVcBGUoiWI5V5DH7M/FPKCScgIrNuty+03lbQW6
DivfCtZEKNI21P0Ar8WIEFDV219lFDBkrewIZfA4Nb8iOHYBwLYUMGdA9JxXo2tt
agbJWwWMSrvvSyNmSXdsS49QSNjFhnTHAQRBVDoARHYUrEB4ajHAU7xlZMs8uqeg
bDxE+SIURDEQVmVMVrNwlokg/ZmvNC5sBIudKbfsOQO6xC9Pp7UM4tNREWamiWg=
=Xn1D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 6 March 2015 06:17:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:17 UTC