- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:14:56 -0700
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
As far as I can tell, the example in ISSUE-53 is covered by sh:hasValue. What was missing was a corresponding "exists property value in class" construct, which is covered by QCRs. peter On 07/27/2015 05:07 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > If I understand Jose's intention correctly, ISSUE-53 [1] was about making sure > that the same property can show up in multiple places at the same shape. This > is already syntactically supported. However the main use case of this appears > to be Qualified Cardinality Restrictions which are also captured as ISSUE-72. > My proposal is to close both by adopting the current draft in the reference > guide (and Turtle file): > > http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-ref/#AbstractQualifiedValueShapePropertyConstraint > > > An example test case of this can be found here: > > https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/blob/gh-pages/data-shapes-test-suite/tests/features/core/qualifiedValueShape-001.ttl > > > Holger > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/53 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/72 > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:15:33 UTC