- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:47:28 +1000
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On 7/17/15 4:33 PM, Simon Steyskal wrote:
> I've removed a redundant section ("sh:AndConstraint, sh:OrConstraint"
> was listed twice)
Thanks for fixing this glitch.
> and added one about property path traversal.
Looks like a good example of what could be possible - template designers
could create such helper data structures themselves, and we would
outsource a lot of future work to the user community.
Thanks,
Holger
>
> cheers,
> simon
>
> ---
> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
>
> www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys
>
> Am 2015-07-17 04:20, schrieb Holger Knublauch:
>> As my action from today's telecon, I have created a wiki page and
>> enumerated a few scenarios where shapes graph access is currently used
>> and potentially useful. I welcome comments on how the alternatives
>> could look like, or use cases that I may have forgotten.
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-47:_Can_SPARQL-based_constraints_access_the_shape_graph
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Holger
Received on Friday, 17 July 2015 08:48:06 UTC