- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:01:15 -0700
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
You mean that you want details of the API? I don't think that this has even been discussed. peter On 07/10/2015 07:50 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > Thanks, Peter, for the description. However, we were hoping for actual > examples. The TopBraid implementation uses forms for input and I don't know if > one can capture what the form actually sends to the SHACL code or the raw > output from that. But that's the kind of thing we're looking for. > > kc > > On 7/9/15 10:51 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> My view is that SHACL validation takes two inputs >> 1/ a SHACL shapes graph >> 2/ an RDF data graph or dataset >> >> The output of SHACL validation is a set of constraint violations. >> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations states that these can be >> encoded into an RDF graph and augmented with other information. Alternatively >> you could think of these as just the results of the top-level SPARQL queries >> corresponding to the shapes in the SHACL shapes graph. >> >> My test implementation of my proposal takes two URLs - for SPARQL endpoints >> for the shape and data graphs - and prints the violations (i.e., the results >> of the generated SPARQL queries). >> >> peter >> >> >> On 07/09/2015 10:24 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: >>> There are folks in my area who are interested in attempting to code some SHACL >>> experimentally -- in part as a way to see if it works for the Cultural >>> Heritage data and situation. The sticking point appears to be a lack of >>> description of inputs and outputs to SHACL. >>> >>> Since some of you have already done coding, could you provide some >>> input/output examples that could help these folks get started? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> kc >> >
Received on Friday, 10 July 2015 15:01:48 UTC