Re: introducing CONSTRAINTS from Arthur Ryman on 2015-01-29 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from January 2015)

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:08:18 -0500
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF4FF3A5C5.32B33194-ON85257DDC.005D74D3-85257DDC.005E25F3@ca.ibm.com>

Peter,

I like this approach since it makes RDF graph the primary concept.

However, it would be simpler if we treated entailment as a separate 
consideration, just the way SPARQL does. The input is an RDF graph, which 
may be raw triples or the result of some entailment regime.

-- Arthur Ryman

Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:08:55 UTC