- From: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:03:51 +0100
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJadXXJXc9kXa6x5-uPPvjVGP=5aTt5_N014=NRGL6YfJyRBCg@mail.gmail.com>
> > Yes, but I think we should have a simple definition of what a Shape is >> and I think this definition could be it. >> > > +1 for simple definition Great. I really think we should have a definition of what a Shape is in the context of this group. I think during the last call someone said that it was not clear what a Shape was, I don't remember whom...and that's why I though we should give it a try. Looking at the glossary, I noticed that it didn't appear Shape as a basic concept and I thought it made sense to try to give a definition of Shape in the context of this group. I also think that in the > >> context of this group we can differentiate between a constraint and a >> shape, saying that a shape is a set of constraints on some RDF node. >> > > Does the shape constrain? or does it define? In the Dublin Core work the > "shape" was called a "description" -- it describes the graph and the > desired rules for the graph. Whether one uses those rules to constrain, or > to inform, or to reject, or to simply shake one's head in dismay is a > matter for the application that applies the rules. "Shape expressions" is > very close to this meaning, and is looked on favorably within the DC > community. > I tried to be as general as possible while maintaining a useful definition. Do you think it would be better to change the definition to something like: "A Shape is a set of definitions over the triples that involve a given RDF node." ? I would not oppose to that change...the main point, I think, is that a shape can be compound from several other basic constraints (or definitions) and that it involves the triples that depart and that arrive to a given RDF node. Best regards, Jose Labra > > kc > > > > >> Apart from that, we can maintain the definitions of "constraint", >> "scoped constraint" and "unscoped constraint" which I also think they >> make sense. >> >> Best regards, Jose Labra >> >> peter >> >> >> On 01/23/2015 10:10 AM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo wrote: >> > I edited the Glossary page to add a possible definition of shape >> as: >> > >> > "A Shape is a set of constraints over the properties and objects >> of an >> > RDF node" >> > >> > I think it is in accordance with the use of the term in the WG >> and does >> > not enter in conflict with other terms. >> > >> > -- Saludos, Labra >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1 >> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUwqFwAAoJECjN6+QThfjzeGgIALSkMbDZSfxnNqslwhRHbfsl >> HdiJUBCvIq2vzRm9TKRO139ochhm/tq+wRrpGF5fGPp8H7VLRcVzLXjMSR/ys9bK >> mbMPx7eWPJAE8BrTcTgcsaDsCBv12+AriJ+4Kged1TajCiecqALrN39zV7+eVYQO >> wMOiG1hul/MDtuCLFE3Dd+abm3b1CRXOuI/QYQcVsZ6KEtfnCgaxdeCG+bQd/ZxX >> inKsVZIIo8ozpGpGfb1tdJPkpw8WAGy6jObqPAh06wYpi+v7dIGOFDG1YRbulzYx >> GDa8FHlRU8cZ8DbDBEDebDPDM0UR3/IEMWgI/0dn20c+ZaE9tNckunAmsj6dSfI= >> =iFnH >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Saludos, Labra >> > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 > > -- Saludos, Labra
Received on Saturday, 24 January 2015 20:04:39 UTC