W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 09:54:29 +1000
Message-ID: <54C2DF35.30401@topquadrant.com>
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org

On 1/24/15, 9:47 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Yes, but I could have a graph with related graphs, none of which are 
> defined by classes.

Classes never define graphs. A graph is just a collection of triples.

> How do I then target a specific graph?

When the constraint evaluation starts, it is parameterized by a default 
graph, i.e. a collection of triples. That graph may ldom:include other 
graphs, forming a larger graph for the evaluation. The graph may contain 
triples for LDOM constraint declarations directly, but any of those 
subgraphs may also point to an outside collection of constraint 
declarations via ldom:library. The process in which the default graph 
and any additional constraint libraries are selected is 
application-specific and not covered by the current LDOM draft.

I am not sure if this clarifies it, we may have different 
interpretations of "graph".

Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 23:55:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 23 January 2015 23:55:01 UTC