Re: shapes-ACTION-8: Write up rdfunit processing

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

> Looks good.  The third paragraph has perhaps too much elaboration, but the
> overall length is fine by me.
>
> On reading the description, it looks as if RDFUnit incorporates much or
> all of the functionality of Stardog ICV.
>
>
> Could you include a pointer to an external document on RDFUnit?


I refined it a bit further. Only today I found out that ICV supports SPARQL
as a constraint definition language. I had the impression that ICV uses
only OWL and SWRL syntax. However they do not mention this neither on their
website [1] nor on their specification document [2].

So yes, as a polyglot approach [3] I can now see the similarity.
In addition, RDFUnit defines "SPARQL patterns" which are in a way similar
to SPIN templates

Best,
Dimtiris


[1] http://clarkparsia.com/pellet/icv/
[2] http://docs.stardog.com/icv/icv-specification.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2012/12/rdf-val/submissions/Stardog

>
>
> peter
>
>
> On 01/13/2015 12:30 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
>
>> I prepared a draft about RDFUnit on the page Peter created
>> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Existing_Systems
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:50 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue
>> Tracker
>> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     shapes-ACTION-8: Write up rdfunit processing
>>
>>     http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/actions/8
>>
>>     Assigned to: Dimitris Kontokostas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dimitris Kontokostas
>> Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
>> Research Group: http://aksw.org
>> Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
>>
>
>


-- 
Dimitris Kontokostas
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Research Group: http://aksw.org
Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas