- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:08:27 -0500
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I have updated the wiki [1] with the following additional text: This user story is motivated by Linked Data and how information resources are created (e.g. via HTTP POST) or modified (e.g. via HTTP PUT). In these situations, the body of the HTTP request has an RDF content type (RDF/XML, Turtle, JSON-LD, etc.). The server typically needs to verify that the body of the request satisfies some application-specific constraints. If the request does not satisfy the constraints them it will fail the request and respond with 400 Bad Request or some similar response. This user story draws attention to the fact that RDF content is in general a graph. The concept of RDF graph is defined in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-rdf-graph. A general RDF graph may not be connected and in fact disconnected RDF graphs do appear in real-world Linked Data specifications. Therefore, the output of this workgroup must support the description of constraints on general RDF graphs, connected or not. [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S35:_Describe_disconnected_graphs _________________________________________________________ Arthur Ryman, PhD Distinguished Engineer | Master Inventor | Academy of Technology Chief Data Officer SWG | Rational 905.413.3077 (phone) | 416.939.5063 (cell) IBM InterConnect 2015 From: "RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org Date: 12/19/2014 01:17 PM Subject: shapes-ISSUE-19 (S35 not RDF): S35 appeals to something that is not RDF shapes-ISSUE-19 (S35 not RDF): S35 appeals to something that is not RDF http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/19 Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider On product: S35 https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S35:_Describe_disconnected_graphs talks about a containment relationship that is implicit because a node is in a graph. This appears to be outside the scope of RDF.
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 20:08:55 UTC