public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from August 2015 by date

Monday, 31 August 2015

• Re: Properties v classes in validation Holger Knublauch
• Properties v classes in validation Karen Coyle
• Re: ISSUE-51: Updated draft and proposal Holger Knublauch
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 Holger Knublauch
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 Arthur Ryman

Friday, 28 August 2015

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG [minutes] for 27 August 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG [minutes] for 27 August 2015 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 27 August 2015

• ISSUE-51: Updated draft and proposal Holger Knublauch
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 August 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 Holger Knublauch
• Regrets Simon Steyskal
• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 August 2015 Arthur Ryman
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 August 2015 Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

Wednesday, 26 August 2015

• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 Holger Knublauch
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 August 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 Holger Knublauch
• my vote on ISSUE-70 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• probable regrets for Thursday Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity Karen Coyle
• Re: ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity Simon Steyskal

Tuesday, 25 August 2015

• Re: ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity Karen Coyle
• Re: Validation - positive results Arnaud Le Hors
• Validation - positive results Karen Coyle

Monday, 24 August 2015

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-70: Proposed clean up of sh:defaultValueType Holger Knublauch

Friday, 21 August 2015

• RDF Data Shapes Minutes for 20 August 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• AW: Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] Simon Steyskal
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] Axel Polleres
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] Simon Steyskal
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] Dimitris Kontokostas
• shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] Simon Steyskal
• AW: reviewing the FPWD Simon Steyskal

Thursday, 20 August 2015

• reviewing the FPWD Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ACTION-28: Review http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-ref/ RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 Holger Knublauch
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 19 August 2015

• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 Arthur Ryman
• RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: sh:allowedValues and skos:Collection Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ISSUE-82 (Unique language): Shall SHACL Core include support for unique language constraints? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 18 August 2015

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] Arnaud Le Hors
• RE: Update and opportunities with SHACL Markus Lanthaler
• Re: sh:allowedValues and skos:Collection Holger Knublauch

Monday, 17 August 2015

• sh:allowedValues and skos:Collection Miika Alonen
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-80 (Scheme URIs): Constraint to limit IRIs against scheme/namespace, possibly with dereferencing [SHACL Spec] Miika Alonen

Tuesday, 11 August 2015

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Miika Alonen

Thursday, 13 August 2015

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Miika Alonen

Friday, 14 August 2015

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Miika Alonen
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 13 August 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 13 August 2015 Arthur Ryman
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-80 (Scheme URIs): Constraint to limit IRIs against scheme/namespace, possibly with dereferencing [SHACL Spec] Miika Alonen
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-80 (Scheme URIs): Constraint to limit IRIs against scheme/namespace, possibly with dereferencing [SHACL Spec] Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
• Re: nomenclature in current document - ISSUE-65 Holger Knublauch
• Re: nomenclature in current document - ISSUE-65 Holger Knublauch
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Holger Knublauch
• AW: Re: what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed) Simon Steyskal
• Re: nomenclature in current document - ISSUE-65 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed) Holger Knublauch
• what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• nomenclature in current document - ISSUE-65 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-58: Added sh:ignoredProperties to sh:ClosedShapeConstraint Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 13 August 2015

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Karen Coyle
• ISSUE-72: sh:qualifiedValueShape added to spec Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ISSUE-80 (Scheme URIs): Constraint to limit IRIs against scheme/namespace, possibly with dereferencing [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 13 August 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Phil Archer
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] Simon Steyskal
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] Simon Steyskal
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] Simon Steyskal
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 12 August 2015

• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL Holger Knublauch
• RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 13 August 215 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: A simpler proposal for reporting SHACL results - ISSUE-51 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints John Walker
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Martynas Jusevičius
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Phil Archer
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Martynas Jusevičius
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Miika Alonen
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Phil Archer
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Miika Alonen
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Miika Alonen
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL Holger Knublauch
• Extending SHACL Core (was: Update and opportunities with SHACL) Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 11 August 2015

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Holger Knublauch
• RE: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Update and opportunities with SHACL Markus Lanthaler
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Karen Coyle
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL Holger Knublauch
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL Tom Johnson
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL Holger Knublauch

Monday, 10 August 2015

• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL Tom Johnson
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL Holger Knublauch
• RE: Update and opportunities with SHACL Arnaud Le Hors
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 6 August 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• RE: Update and opportunities with SHACL Markus Lanthaler
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Karen Coyle
• RE: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Phil Archer
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Irene Polikoff
• RE: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Saturday, 8 August 2015

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Karen Coyle
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Holger Knublauch

Friday, 7 August 2015

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Martynas Jusevičius
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Phil Archer
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Martynas Jusevičius
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Phil Archer
• Re: ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 6 August 2015

• Re: A simpler proposal for reporting SHACL results - ISSUE-51 Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-74 (SPARQL endpoint support): Should SHACL support vallidating RDF graphs accessible via unmodified SPARQL endpoints [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-74 (SPARQL endpoint support): Should SHACL support vallidating RDF graphs accessible via unmodified SPARQL endpoints [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman
• Re: ISSUE-76: Can errors be treated as false? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-76: Can errors be treated as false? Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 5 August 2015

• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 6 August 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ISSUE-76: Can errors be treated as false? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 Holger Knublauch
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch Holger Knublauch
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 Holger Knublauch
• Re: A simpler proposal for reporting SHACL results - ISSUE-51 Holger Knublauch
• Re: modelling using SHACL - a bad idea - ISSUE-23 Holger Knublauch
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 4 August 2015

• Re: modelling using SHACL - a bad idea - ISSUE-23 Holger Knublauch
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Arnaud Le Hors
• shapes-ISSUE-78 (sh:abstract): Should SHACL support marking classes as abstract [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-32 as done Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• modelling using SHACL - a bad idea - ISSUE-23 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• A simpler proposal for reporting SHACL results - ISSUE-51 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch Holger Knublauch
• Re: Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch Holger Knublauch
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-51 as specified in shacl-ref Holger Knublauch
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension Holger Knublauch

Monday, 3 August 2015

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Holger Knublauch
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints Karen Coyle
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-51 as specified in shacl-ref Dimitris Kontokostas
• ISSUE-76: Can errors be treated as false? Holger Knublauch
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension Holger Knublauch
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-51 as specified in shacl-ref Holger Knublauch

Sunday, 2 August 2015

• Re: ISSUE-64: Spec updated to include sh:minInclusive etc. Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 1 August 2015

• proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension Dimitris Kontokostas

Last message date: Monday, 31 August 2015 23:13:24 UTC