- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 09:46:23 +1000
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
FWIW I have added some support for closed shapes to my draft
http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#ClosedShape
To those who suggested this feature: does this look about right?
The design currently excludes rdf:type and sh:nodeShape. Does that make
sense or must even those properties be explicitly enumerated via
sh:property?
(Other interpretations of "closed" shapes could be expressed via
SPARQL's NOT EXISTS etc).
Thanks
Holger
Received on Thursday, 30 April 2015 23:48:05 UTC