- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 18:20:21 -0700
- To: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@stanford.edu>, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- CC: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I believe that you are asking for something like sh:shapeScope in https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Shacl-sparql#SHACL_Extended_Condition _Language peter On 04/26/2015 04:34 PM, Michel Dumontier wrote: [...] > I guess this goes back to the comment i made a while ago ... with some > kind of selector it would be more obvious how to choose the triples for > validation. For instance, something like: > > :IssueShape a sh:Shape; sh:selector [ sh:property rdf:type; sh:valueType > :Issue . ] > > I like this because it gives us the power to generate more complex > selectors. Otherwise, we'd might just specify to look for the > rdfs:subClassOf predicate on the shape (obviously, we'd need to type our > shape to sh:Shape here too). what do you think? > > m. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVPY7VAAoJECjN6+QThfjzPiAH/jwSjhgxUkWT0GvhIBipfpPJ 8ajuK4BJ99UrzmiU2aEWOfEMt0vx1dTXrmuPB3rAPGyFQ4B2nS5Ei90Fm37RvqfT MRUJWXvI/XAJF8LKxQXTXYAv/zLBr+HeQnnVA/TtMmggfFXEvvHPAoD3swuNSccq NIy5KMBaEfstyUWzdFGYWpTy73CI4Gv1M1c7xMtHUZomdHQ4DJ1uyudBC30FqhYP vtEDJAm1LCUpeqeNeaKiWPPQofQQuukcuZoeYuDxlxiGSbXsWE/iJ7/+y/3lMZw+ DX1GHXEE2Wafh9LGOt9pPSyv91v5MrEW7lCixOxM8C3umnJhyyWvIsxI8nIDfnQ= =fprN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 01:20:50 UTC